Bitcoin Has No Intrinsic Value? A Thorough Debunking of the Myth

·

A logical rebuttal to one of the most common misconceptions about Bitcoin.

This article dismantles the pervasive criticism that "Bitcoin has no intrinsic value" by dissecting its semantics, underlying assumptions, and academic arguments. Below, we explore why this claim is fundamentally flawed and how Bitcoin's properties as money redefine traditional economic paradigms.


Debunking the Literal Meaning of "Intrinsic Value"

Definitions Matter

Hypothetical Rebuttal:
Nothing in the universe is universally valued by all humans at all times. Even water’s life-sustaining properties fail if one person rejects survival. Thus, nothing has intrinsic value—including Bitcoin or gold.


Beyond Semantics: Addressing Core Criticisms

1. Utility: Does Bitcoin Need Alternative Uses?

Claim: "Bitcoin has no utility beyond money."
Rebuttal:

Key Insight:
Utility aids early monetization but becomes irrelevant once an asset evolves into money. Bitcoin’s lack of alternative uses doesn’t diminish its monetary potential.


2. "Bitcoin Isn’t Backed"

Misconception: Money requires backing (e.g., gold’s physicality, USD’s government support).
Truth:

Bitcoin’s Edge:


Academic Arguments

Mises’ Regression Theorem

Circularity Issue: Money’s value depends on others valuing it—a loop.
Solution:
Bitcoin’s value traces back to pizza (2010) → USD → gold → gold’s utility. This regression satisfies the theorem by anchoring Bitcoin’s value to a tangible good (pizza).

Aristotle’s Properties of Money

Bitcoin meets 4/5 criteria (durable, portable, divisible, fungible). The fifth—intrinsic value—is outdated. Aristotle couldn’t foresee digital scarcity, rendering this criterion irrelevant.


Appendices: Key Insights

Appendix A: Properties of Good Money

Technical:

Social:

Appendix B: Why Gold Failed

Appendix C: Fiat Money

Appendix D: Mining Costs Don’t Support Value

Gold’s price reflects demand, not production costs. If demand vanishes, mining becomes irrelevant.


Conclusion

The "no intrinsic value" critique collapses under scrutiny. Bitcoin’s value arises from its unparalleled monetary properties and growing adoption—just as gold’s did millennia ago. Repeating this debunked claim only hinders progress toward solving our broken monetary system.


FAQ

Q1: Does Bitcoin need utility to be valuable?
A1: No. Money’s value stems from its monetary properties and network effects, not alternative uses.

Q2: Is gold really "backed" by its industrial uses?
A2: No. Gold’s monetary premium dwarfs its utility value, which offers negligible "backing."

Q3: How does Bitcoin satisfy the Regression Theorem?
A3: Its value regresses to pizza → USD → gold → gold’s utility, breaking the circularity.

👉 Explore Bitcoin’s monetary revolution

👉 Learn why network effects matter