Understanding Uniswap V2 vs V3: A Deep Dive

·

Introduction

Uniswap has been the cornerstone of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) since its launch in 2018, boasting a Total Value Locked (TVL) of $3.295 billion. Its evolution from V2 to V3 introduced groundbreaking features like concentrated liquidity and range orders, enhancing capital efficiency and reducing slippage. This article explores the key differences between these versions and their impact on DeFi.


V2 Structure

Uniswap V2 relies on a constant product algorithm (x * y = k) to maintain liquidity. Key features:

👉 Discover how V2 revolutionized DeFi


V3 Structure

Uniswap V3’s concentrated liquidity model allows LPs to allocate funds to specific price ranges, improving capital efficiency:


Design Differences

FeatureV2V3
LiquidityUniform distributionCustom price ranges
TokensERC-20 (fungible)ERC-721 (non-fungible)
EfficiencyLower capital efficiencyHigh capital efficiency

Active Liquidity


Range Orders

👉 Learn advanced LP strategies


Slippage Resistance

V3’s deep liquidity minimizes slippage through:


Conclusion

Uniswap V3’s innovations—concentrated liquidity, range orders, and capital efficiency—make it the preferred choice for traders, despite higher LP complexity. With V4 on the horizon, Uniswap continues to lead the AMM space.


FAQs

1. What is concentrated liquidity?

It allows LPs to allocate funds to specific price ranges, maximizing efficiency.

2. How does V3 reduce slippage?

Via deep liquidity pools, JIT liquidity, and game-theoretic incentives.

3. What are the risks for LPs in V3?

Higher impermanent loss and the need for active management.


Keywords