The on-chain derivatives sector remains one of DeFi's most competitive arenas, with dozens of live protocols and new projects launching frequently. This analysis compares six leading platforms across critical performance indicators.
While raw data might suggest investment potential, understanding context—especially protocol design and revenue-sharing models—is essential for informed decisions.
1. GMX: The Zero-Slippage Leader
GMX dominates as the largest perpetual synthetic DEX by TVL, trading volume, fees, and revenue. Its unique zero-slippage trading attracts users, while its fee distribution (70% to LPs, 30% to stakers) makes GMX highly appealing to investors.
Key Highlights:
- Current P/E ratio: 31.16 (indicating premium valuation)
- Upcoming V2 features: Chainlink low-latency oracles, multi-asset support, lower fees
- Competitive pressures may lower fair value to ~$40 (P/E ~20) if V2 underperforms
👉 Discover how GMX’s architecture enables zero-slippage trades
2. Synthetix: The Synthetic Asset Pioneer
Synthetix enables synthetic asset minting via SNX collateral, powering platforms like Kwenta. Despite its large market cap, its economics raise concerns:
- 100% fees to SNX stakers, but $100M+ in token incentives outweigh $36M fee income
- Negative P/E suggests unsustainable model without added incentives
3. Gains Network: The Multichain Underdog
Gains Network offers crypto/FX/commodities leverage trading with evolving fee splits:
- Current: 33% to stakers, 17% to LPs
- Post-September: 61% to stakers (potential valuation boost)
- P/E of 10 and high volume/TVL ratio (568) indicate undervaluation
4. Perpetual Protocol: The Uniswap V3 Derivative
Built atop Uniswap V3, Perpetual Protocol allocates:
- 80% fees to LPs
- 14% to PERP stakers
With $1.4M annual revenue vs. $2.8M token unlocks, its negative yield deters investors.
5. Level Finance: The Incentive-Driven Contender
Early LVL token incentives drove volume, but key metrics now decline:
- 45% fees to LPs, 10% to LVL stakers
- 1000x volume/TVL ratio suggests artificial inflation
- Negative earnings due to excessive token distribution
6. MUX Protocol: The Aggregator Play
MUX combines trading and aggregation across ecosystems:
- 70% fees to ETH LPs/MUX stakers
- Low market cap but strong extensibility
- A speculative yet intriguing opportunity
Comparative Metrics (Hypothetical Table)
| Protocol | P/E Ratio | Fee Split (Stakers) | Volume/TVL | Key Strength |
|----------------|-----------|---------------------|------------|-----------------------|
| GMX | 31.16 | 30% | 120x | Zero-slippage |
| Synthetix | Negative | 100% | 85x | Synthetic assets |
| Gains Network | 10 | 33%→61% | 568x | Multichain leverage |
| Perpetual | Negative | 14% | 90x | Uniswap V3 integration|
| Level Finance | Negative | 10% | 1000x | Early incentives |
| MUX | N/A | 70% | 200x | Aggregation |
FAQs
Q: Which protocol offers the lowest trading fees?
A: GMX V2 aims to reduce fees significantly upon launch.
Q: Are these protocols suitable for long-term investment?
A: While some show promise (e.g., Gains Network), most face sustainability challenges—DYOR.
Q: How does MUX differ from others?
A: It aggregates liquidity across platforms rather than operating as a standalone DEX.
👉 Explore advanced strategies for on-chain derivatives trading
Final Thoughts
The on-chain derivatives space evolves rapidly, with no clear winner yet. Metrics like P/E ratios and volume/TVL help assess viability, but design innovations (e.g., GMX’s V2) could redefine leadership. Always prioritize fundamental analysis over hype.
Disclaimer: This analysis is informational, not financial advice.