Ethereum One Year After The Merge: 99.9% Energy Drop, Rise of Liquid Staking, and ETH Enters Deflationary Era

·

Ethereum’s transition from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS)—known as "The Merge"—marked a pivotal moment in blockchain history. Introduced over a year ago, this shift brought staking into the spotlight as a new method to validate transactions and secure the network.

Under PoW, miners competed to solve cryptographic puzzles to add blocks. Now, in PoS, validators stake 32 ETH and are randomly selected to propose blocks. Both models reward participants with ETH for successful block additions.

While staking drastically reduced Ethereum’s environmental footprint, challenges around centralization, censorship, and infrastructure risks persist. Here’s a deep dive into five key transformations since The Merge.


1. Ethereum’s Energy Consumption Drops 99.9%

The Merge overhauled Ethereum’s consensus mechanism, replacing energy-intensive mining with staking. Pre-Merge, Ethereum’s energy use rivaled small nations, fueling debates among critics of NFTs and DeFi. Bitcoin, still operating on PoW, consumes energy comparable to Singapore’s annual usage.

Post-Merge, Ethereum’s energy demand plummeted by 99.9%, decoupling the network from environmental concerns. This remains one of the upgrade’s undisputed successes.


2. Staking Distribution Raises Centralization Concerns

PoW concentrated power among a few mining giants. PoS aimed to democratize participation but introduced new barriers:

Lido, a decentralized staking pool, now controls 32.3% of staked ETH, nearing the 33% threshold that could pose security risks. Critics argue this mirrors the centralization PoS sought to avoid.


3. MEV and Censorship Debates

Post-Merge, validators profit from Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)—reordering or inserting transactions for extra fees. While MEV boosts earnings, it’s criticized for enabling:

Efforts to diversify relay providers have cut censorship rates from 78% (2022) to 35% today.


4. Liquid Staking Tokens Dominate ETH Markets

Liquid staking emerged as a game-changer, offering:

Despite post-Shapella unlock options, LSTs thrive, with a $20B market cap. stETH leads with 72.24% market share.


5. ETH Becomes a Deflationary Asset

The Merge altered ETH’s tokenomics:

While deflation could increase ETH’s value, macroeconomic factors have muted price impacts so far.


FAQs

Q: How does staking differ from mining?

A: Mining uses computational power (PoW), while staking locks ETH (PoS) to validate transactions, cutting energy use by 99.9%.

Q: Why is Lido’s 32.3% staking share concerning?

A: Nearing 33% risks centralization, potentially compromising network security.

Q: Can MEV be eliminated?

A: Unlikely—MEV is inherent to blockchains, but solutions like MEV-Boost aim to mitigate its downsides.

Q: Are liquid staking tokens safe?

A: LSTs carry smart contract risks but offer liquidity advantages over traditional staking.

Q: Will ETH’s deflationary model boost its price?

A: Long-term, reduced supply may increase scarcity, but short-term prices hinge on broader market trends.

👉 Explore Ethereum staking opportunities to maximize your crypto strategy.

👉 Learn how MEV impacts your transactions and ways to protect your trades.


Ethereum’s post-Merge evolution highlights its sustainability gains and growing pains. As liquid staking and deflation reshape its economy, the network’s decentralization ethos faces ongoing tests. With scalability upgrades like Dencun on the horizon, Ethereum’s journey remains a benchmark for blockchain innovation.